[nanomsg] Re: Interested in using nanomsg

  • From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:51:37 +0200

On 26/09/13 21:19, Jeff Archer wrote:
With this change and commenting out the extra asserts I now have all
tests passing.

Ok, I managed to reproduce, although it took running the test in a tight loop and waiting for several minutes.

The problem is that although the send buffer is set to 200 bytes, the sender can write only 190 bytes, then blocks and waits for the buffer to be emptied.

I'll create a bug tracker issue for this.

Martin


Other related posts: