+1 On the bribe.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Andriy Drozdyuk <drozzy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ironically, this whole fiasco is how I saw nanomsg in the firstplace...
For what it's worth, this community is not as bad as the newsfeeds make it
out to be. I think Garrett should be bribed to step back in - while you
guys make up your mind (just random 2 cents), while CoC should be
implemented - and perhaps C4 as well.
So does nanomsg SUB socket also hang after a while randomly? (my zeromq
sub recv stops after 254 messages in pyzmq...)
Mangos looks good - but how will it develop in the future? Will it follow
nanomsg or the other way around?
Also, you guys have better support for erlang, which seems to be pretty
dead for zeromq.
How about security? Anything similar to curvezmq? Because that thing is
pretty convenient.
Andriy D.,
ON, Canada
