[muglo] Re: Editing and converting Images (Was: PowerPoint
- From: Lee Dickey <Lee@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:45:28 -0500
I think this explains a lot. BMP is a format invented by and for
Windows OS, and so is the software. I am convinced that it is not
the JPG file itself that is larger, it is what PPT does with them
that produces this bizarre consequence. I still maintain that
JPGs are inherently more compressed than BMPs.
Lee
On 2005 Jan 27, at 12:04, Eric Dunbar wrote:
>> There is a slight hitch in PowerPoint and that is that (the Windows
>> version at least) sometimes compresses BMP files. JPEGs come in as
>> compressed images and PowerPoint seems not to be able to handle them
>> effectively -- if you manipulate them they baloon in size. The few
>> times I used BMPs I managed to retain the high quality of uncompressed
>> images but with "smaller" .ppt files (I wonder if it runs BMPs through
>> a GIF-style compression).
>
> Of course, my BMP images (maps) were conducive to effective lossless
> compression since there were long lines of pixels with the same
> colour. The JPEG images (same resolution, 75% quality) resulted in PPT
> files at least three of four times as big.
_________________________________________________
For information concerning the MUGLO List just click on
http://muglo.on.ca/Pages/joinus.html
Our Archives can be viewed at
//www.freelists.org/archives/muglo
Don't forget to periodically check our web site at:
http://muglo.on.ca/
Other related posts:
