[mira_talk] Re: Unpaired reads and segment_placement = ? or unknown
- From: Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "mira_talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mira_talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:34:24 +0000
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Bastien Chevreux <bach@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11 Feb 2014, at 12:18 , Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> If I comment out the segment_placement line it works - but I wanted
>> to tell MIRA to treat this as unpaired data. I'm guessing this is a
>> regression - otherwise the manual is confusing me:
>>
>
> *sigh* Well intentioned last minute changes pave the road to hell. Or
> something like this.
>
> I added code to warn users about inconsistent settings vs data, but I
> somehow missed that particular case as, for unpaired data, I simply leave
> out all placement and library info in my manifests (and then MIRA expects
> the readgroup to be unpaired). This is also the workaround you will have to
> use atm, sorry.
>
> B.
No problem - I'll do that for the time being - thanks for the quick answer.
Peter
--
You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing
list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit
http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html
Other related posts:
