Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0
- From: Coda Highland <chighland@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:06:52 -0800
Before I actually used JUCE, I would have recommended it.
Having spent the last year programming with it, I can no longer
maintain that endorsement for general GUI development.
Yes, it's small, but that size comes at a price. It's great for audio
work (which is why I'm using it) but it's extremely primitive in terms
of GUI support. Even Java's GUI features are more robust than JUCE's.
I could go on, but it's way too off-topic for this discussion.
/s/ Adam
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Dimter 'malkia' Stanev
<malkia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Juce - www.rawmaterialsoftware.com
> but it's C++, and relies on inheritance heavily.
>
> I like it, as it's very small, much like lua/luajit to embed
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 1:01 PM, Peter Colberg <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 01:19:04PM -0700, Simon Heath wrote:
>>> It will. A scripting language with the potential to do super-fast math
>>> and manage large awkward data structures is really useful. I'm doing my
>>> Master's project (thermal image analysis and simulation) in Python+numpy/
>>> scipy, but if LuaJIT had some of the library bindings I wanted then it would
>>> have been a much better choice.
>>
>> Which libraries would you use with LuaJIT if there were bindings?
>>
>> Peter
>>
>
Other related posts:
