Dear speranza, does
X follow from Y & X
You have not provided any answer.
Certainly stay in the grove and show repsetc for the Zamboni, which Is
capitalized.
From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of Donal McEvoy
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 5:32 PM
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: (no subject)
How many books with 'no subject' and no title are worth reading? This is one of
the musings prompted by these subjectless posts. Another is that while some of
us labour in the groves of Wittengstein's work and its interpretation surely we
should have more tantalising things dangled aimlessly before us than "zamboni"
and the like. Another is that there is a reason why expressions like' Don't
forget your meds' and 'You're not even the biggest in the playground' become
part of everyday currency.
D
Near Zulu Natal planet-wise
Otherwise in London
________________________________
From: Adriano Palma <Palma@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Palma@xxxxxxxxxx>>
To: "palma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:palma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
<palma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:palma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2017, 12:41
Subject: [lit-ideas] (no subject)
Consider, which logic prohibits the implication
X FOLLOWS FROM Y & X
? IF NONE, IS THERE
A counterexample?
If not the rule is logically valid or not?
