[lit-ideas] Re: for those who are into hypotheticals
- From: Ursula Stange <Ursula@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:17:29 -0400
My answer (after thinking for 6 seconds) is yes, certainly.
I'll have to think longer to tease out all the reasons, but surely Gore
(or almost anyone else) would have reigned in Israel and demanded a
ceasefire weeks ago. The Bush regime, instead, sends them more and
better bombs and cries crocodile tears over the carnage. I can't think
of a more morally bankrupt administration. Oh for the days of the
"Teapot Dome Scandal." Or the tell-all spots on the navy blue dress.
Ursula
JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx wrote:
Had Bush not been re "elected" in 2004, or "elected" in 2000, would
that have made any difference in the Israel/Hezbollah/Lebanon
situation today?
Julie Krueger
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: for those who are into hypotheticals
- From: Andreas Ramos
- References:
- [lit-ideas] for those who are into hypotheticals
- From: JimKandJulieB
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] for those who are into hypotheticals
- » [lit-ideas] Re: for those who are into hypotheticals
- » [lit-ideas] Re: for those who are into hypotheticals
- » [lit-ideas] Re: for those who are into hypotheticals
- » [lit-ideas] Re: for those who are into hypotheticals
- » [lit-ideas] Re: for those who are into hypotheticals
Julie Krueger
- [lit-ideas] Re: for those who are into hypotheticals
- From: Andreas Ramos
- [lit-ideas] for those who are into hypotheticals
- From: JimKandJulieB