[lit-ideas] Re: Why Gadhafi Disarmed
- From: ursula@xxxxxxxxxx
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 06:25:08 -0500 (CDT)
Is the point here that the "liberation" of Iraq was a
"good" thing because it scared Gaddafi into abandoning
his weapons program? What would the tens of thousands
of dead Iraqi civilians say to that? What would the
families of hundreds of dead American soldiers say to
that? Bush is very frightening. And his war is very
definitely not a good thing. Indeed, the terrorists
Bush is spawning will make Gaddafi look like a good
thing.
Ursula
usually scared in North Bay
(but visiting scared in Providence RI)
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 00:40:57 EDT, Scribe1865@xxxxxxx
wrote:
>
> In a message dated 4/17/2004 11:11:42 PM Eastern
> Daylight Time,
> omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> Bush and co. would love us to read between the lines
> that Gaddafi was oh so scared by what he saw them
> cowboys do to Iraq that he quickly dropped his evil
> plans.
> Bush didn't say that Gadhafi disarmed because of fear
> of conflict, Gadhafi
> said that. Perhaps Gadhafi was talking out of his
> backside to win favor for
> sanction-ending goodies when he made those remarks,
but
> they are in the public
> record.
> But there was no reason for him to be scared,
> because there was no US plan to attack Lybia after
> Iraq; Syria, Iran, and North Korea were being
> mentioned as possible candidates.
>
> How do we know that?
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub,
> vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit
www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
