** Low Priority ** ** Reply Requested by 6/29/2012 (Friday) ** l'implacabile avanzata del cretino e' segnalata soprattutto dalla valenza attribuita a totali troiate come la sequenza delle lettere da inproprio a improprio. perche' tutto cio' passi per filosofico lo sa solo quel porco di io >>> <Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx> 28/06/2012 10:57 PM >>> In a message dated 6/28/2012 4:53:19 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, rpaul@xxxxxxxx writes: Donal writes > As I am still here trying to explain: without understanding the 'key > tenet', PI cannot be properly understood. The 'key tenet' is at the back > of W says: and is fundamental to what W seeks to show. This implies that I have never 'properly understood' the Philosophical Investigations (all or in part, apparently). In light of that, my participation in this discussion is at an end. ---- I think it is Warnock who corrected Austin once: ---- He plays cricket incorrectly. ---- No, he plays cricket inproperly. Or was it the other way round? Variations on a theme by D. McEvoy: >PI cannot be properly understood. >PI can be improperly understood. >PI can be understood. >PI MAY be understood. >PI may be misunderstood. >PI may not be improperly misunderstood. Etc. Cheers, Speranza ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html Please find our Email Disclaimer here: http://www.ukzn.ac.za/disclaimer/