Robert Paul asked what I meant when I referred to the language of goods. It goes something like this: "Let us return to the good which we are seeking and inquire what it might be. It appears to be different actions or arts; for in medical art it is different from that in strategy and similarly from that in any of the rest of the arts. What then is the good in each? Is it not that for the sake of which the rest are done? This is health in the medical art, victory in strategy, a house in architecture, something else in another art, and in every action or intention it is the end; for it is for the sake of this that the rest are done by all men." Etc, etc. Robert knows this stuff far better than I. Sincerely, Phil Enns Toronto, ON ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html