The 'old' razor is as good as the 'new' one. However, if they didn't bring out a 'new' one, many people wouldn't have jobs (tweaking the thing, designing the packaging, etc.). In essence that's the underlying reason why capitalism was predicted (since forever) to contain within it the seeds of its own destruction, because it's based in infinite growth on a finite planet ("Limits to Growth", 1972). Really our economic system is corporatism; like any 'ism' capitalism is a construct that works on paper but mutates in reality, in this case into corporatism. It can be argued capitalism is about amenities and a better moral life; corporatism is about consumption as an end in itself. Some say that our current economic malaise is a product of the fact that we've hit limits to growth. In an ironic yin/yang, the creative destruction of Marx became the capitalist virtue of Schumpeter. In the end though, it's nature who bats last. We've been growing a tree to the sky and it just won't grow anymore. There's an interesting book called The Story of Stuff by Annie Leonard. Below is a link to a 21-minute video. The book is a much more detailed account of *why* we live in a consumer society. Believe it or not, we Americans did not always exist to consume. That behavior was deliberately orchestrated at the beginning of the 20th century and has become such a part of the air and water that it's become life itself. Only one of myriad inducements, the song Second Hand Rose (Ziegfeld Follies, 1921) is about inspiring consumption; planned obsolescence. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCtrcAp3TEY ;("Even the piano in the parlor, daddy bought for ten cents on the dollar." How old fashioned, we need a *new* piano (along with everything else, leaving her feeling abused no less), and of course it would need to be financed; conspicuous consumption.) Ironically the figurative expression 'part of the air and water' in this case is literal from creating and disposing of stuff. It's been said we have dizzying change but no progress. One wonders if we didn't have shopping and consuming to do all day long, and working to get this symbolic thing called money to trade for shopping and consuming, what would humans do to pass the time? Seriously. A nonconsumption-based way of life is literally unimaginable. (An ecological rant, for lack of a better word, follows.) The word consumption used to be the term for tuberculosis, it consumed the body. From a Gaia perspective we are consuming the planet. Among other things, there's a garbage patch in the Pacific Ocean the size of Texas with something like 47,000 pieces of garbage per square mile of this floating garbage island. It's said that when the sea turtles can no longer swim through it, we're in trouble. There's another forming in the Atlantic. The point is, when we throw something away, there is no away. It goes somewhere, only to come back as the weather extremes of climate change or antibiotic resistance or some other way. (End of rant.) At any rate, this is the link to the video. The link beneath that one is about bottled water, also from Annie Leonard. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLBE5QAYXp8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Se12y9hSOM0&feature=related Andy ________________________________ From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx> To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 4:34 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Paper, Plastic, the Vacuum Gillette made Ad History by creating a commercial where a "public figure," i.e., Tiger Wood, destroys one of their earlier products. He tees up (I think) an old Track-two razor and blasts it down the fairway. Instead one should use the Track-7,000 or whatever, which is safely in his locker at the clubhouse. Imagining this as a universal strategy of product launches, especially in the arms industry, Eric always clean-shaven ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html