[lit-ideas] Re: Long Live the Evolution
- From: andy amago <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 10:12:33 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
-----Original Message-----
From: John McCreery <mccreery@xxxxxxx>
Sent: May 4, 2004 11:09 PM
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Long Live the Evolution
On 2004/05/05, at 11:05, andy amago wrote:
> Torgeir: Did the Europeans "assimilate" to the prevalent lifestyle
> when they
> arrived in America?
>
> A.A. : Absolutely. That's the whole point, that they became Americans
> in their
> new home in which they planned to stay, rather than fantasizing about
> returning
> to the old country.
>
> RP: That is why they still hunt buffalo on the plains, build pueblos
> in the
> Southwest, fish for salmon ifrom the banks of the rivers in the
> Northwest, go to
> sea in whaling canoes along the coast, and hold potlatches to
> establish social
> standing. (Well, maybe they do do that last bit.)
The social anthropologist in me comments--Thank you RP!
The bulk of this thread has provided us with yet another example of
conversation cramped into a free market moralizing model that allocates
praise or blame to individual choices while paying no attention
whatsoever to historical context or sociological realities.
Consider, for example, all those remarkably sloppy references to
"Europeans" as if it mattered not a whit that 17th century immigrants
to North America, spoke English, Dutch, French, and Spanish and
represented a wide variety of aspirations and ambitions--Puritans,
Pilgrims, Planters, Pirates, Missionaries, Conquistadores, to list just
a few common types--virtually all of whom saw themselves as hacking out
new lives in a space populated by "savages" (the aborigines whose fate
would be captured in Ambrose Bierce's famous definition, "Aborigine:
Persons found cumbering the soil of newly conquered countries. They
soon cease to cumber; they fertilize.")
Flash forward to 19th-century European immigrants, who formed ethnic
enclaves in cities and, if left to their own devices in rural settings,
clung to their own ways well into the 20th century, despite the best
efforts of WASP-ish do-gooders to promote the melting pot. (I think,
for example, of the area around Fort Wayne, Indiana, in which my wife
grew up, where German was the language of instruction in public schools
until 1948.)
By the second half of the 19th century there were all sorts of
movements that argued either for assimilation or, alternatively,
radical segregation, as ways to preserve what they saw as America, a
nation that had, through the fires of the Revolution, the writing of
the Constitution, and then the Civil War become (as both sides saw it)
the very model for what a modern nation should be. Immigrants to this
America, who played an important part in its further transformation
from a largely rural and agricultural to a largely industrial and urban
society, faced choices and opportunities quite different from those who
landed at Plymouth Rock or settled at Jamestown or even those who
migrated in the 18th century to places with names like New York,
Philadelphia, Baltimore, Charleston, Savannah, or St. Augustine.
Having said all this, am I asserting that andy amago has no reason for
special concern, that Hispanic or other immigrants will naturally
muddle their way through the usual two or three generations that
assimilation requires? Not a bit.
There are two key factors to consider: neither of which has been
mentioned so far. The first is birth rates, the second modern
transportation and communication technology.
The one central and apparently inevitable fact about every modern
industrialized nation (or at least the members of the OECD) is that the
base populations are not reproducing themselves. There is, for example,
a front page story in today's Asahi Shimbun headlined "Proportion of
Children 13.9%, Continuing 30-year Decline." It contrasts Japan with
Italy (14.3%), Germany (15.0%), France, the UK, and Canada (all around
18%), and the USA (21%). What the USA figure conceals is that high
proportion of children born in the USA whose parents are
first-generation and especially Hispanic immigrants. California is
already the first state in the nation in which the White population has
become a minority. Less noted but equally telling, it is also a state
in which the Black population is smaller than the Hispanic population
and growing less rapidly.
But this is only half the story. What modern transportation and
communication technology have done is create a world in which it is
easy for immigrants to stay in touch with friends and family in their
homelands, which is also a world in which enterprising business people
are able to offer immigrants products and services that provide "a
taste of home" while living somewhere else. (There is now a substantial
literature on the impact of this factor--Googling "diaspora" will lead
you to tons of it.)
The consequences are visible even in New Haven, Indiana, the suburb of
Fort Wayne in which my wife grew up, a place as Midwestern as Middle
America can be. It was, as indicated above, a solidly German Lutheran
community well into the 1950s. When we last visited a year ago, the
language on a billboard on Main Street was Spanish--entirely Spanish.
The grocery stores stocked six-foot shelves of salsa and the vegetables
on offer included a big selection of varieties indigenous to Latin
America. A big item in local news was the successful effort of the
Spanish-speaking community of Fort Wayne to keep open the big Catholic
Church downtown. It had been slated for closure, with its congregation
dispersed to other, suburban churches.
There is no question about it. America's Hispanic immigrants do, in
fact, challenge the traditional "Melting Pot" model in way that it has
never been challenged before. What the result will be is still very
hard to discern. But one thing is for sure--classic white bread
America, the America in which I grew up, is not a plausible option.
A.A. : Thank you for this well crafted piece. You are right, earlier
Europeans did what contemporary Hispanics are doing, which is, inevitably,
cling to the Old World, probably because change is difficult for anyone and
everyone. Centuries later, these early Europeans aren't even a memory, and in
the long run, the playing field leveled out.
However, the hazards of segregation are real, as is demonstrated by today's
racial troubles. Any foundation on the lowest of the low jobs may persist for
generations to come. America is in fact changing, but, for better or for
worse, our heterogenous nature builds change into the system. There is no way
to avoid it.
I think Michael Moore in Bowling for Columbine makes clear that the fundamental
issue in any case is not race, since in Canada race is not a problem, but
rather an out of control terrorist organization called the American media that
pumps chronic fear into our daily lives.
Andy
John L. McCreery
The Word Works, Ltd.
55-13-202 Miyagaya, Nishi-ku
Yokohama, Japan 220-0006
Tel 81-45-314-9324
Email mccreery@xxxxxxx
"Making Symbols is Our Business"
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
