[lit-ideas] Re: Lee Harvey Oswald & the Liberal Crack-Up
- From: "Andy Amago" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:40:00 -0400
There's correct in some assumptions and then there's using her conspiracy
theories to justify a war, which is what happened. Invading Iraq was a
huge black eye for the U.S. There were those who predicted the black eye.
Both you and Lawrence ignored the prediction, as you are now ignoring it
while obsessing about invading Iran. How do you see the world post U.S.
attack on Iran? Iran will roll over, play dead? I asked this once before
and you didn't answer. Lawrence also never answered what 'global
leadership' looks like, even though he's talking about it, and both of you
are still pushing for war. What did you predict the world would look like
post Iraq invasion? Surely you had something in mind?
> [Original Message]
> From: Eric Yost <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 5/6/2006 3:29:29 PM
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Lee Harvey Oswald & the Liberal Crack-Up
>
> Andy: Eric was a huge proponent of her book as
> justifying invading Iraq, and you wanted to invade
> as well.
>
> I still am a proponent of her writing, which opens
> a view into the uncertainties of intelligence
> gathering. So is Clinton's former DCI. But if the
> evidence shows she is wrong in some of her
> conclusions--as it has--I abandon them. However,
> the most recent translations of captured Iraqi
> documents, as well as intelligence disclosures
> related to the Valerie Plame scandal, show that
> she was correct in some of her assumptions.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
