[lit-ideas] JUST THE FACTS, MA'AM. (was Re: Re: Historians & Bush)
- From: "Mike Geary" <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:33:22 -0600
Phil Enns wrote:
> Mike Geary wrote:
>
> "All depends on the interpretation, I guess."
>
> Interpretation of which facts I was referring to, right?
I'm not sure which facts you are/were referring to. My position is, I think,
that something is a fact only because we interpret it as a fact. We need look
no further than the Bush Administration's justification for the war in Iraq to
see the 'truth' of Nietzsche's dictum. It was a justification based on the
interpretation of all those WMD "facts" garnered by the best intelligence
agencies in the world. Oops. OK, seems those facts were interpretations of
other "facts".
Or take Amago's examples: "Johnson's utterly corrupt policies during
Reconstruction following the Civil War are the direct cause of our race
problems in this country." 'Utterly corrupt' -- interpretation; 'the direct
cause of our race problems' -- interpretation;
"Bush has unleashed forces that will haunt us for decades or longer." -- not
just an interpretation, but a prediction based on his interpretation of Bush's
policies;
"He took the U.S. from economic superpower to a debtor nation with nukes"
[well, actually we've been a debtor nation for several decades now]
"while creating a class of Darwinian terrorists (killing off the dummies in
Iraq and leaving the best)" -- interpretation.
And yet Andy says these are facts. In another post Andy writes: "But, all his
actions as president have been severely deleterious to the country." -- by
Andy's interpretation, but just 13 months ago the majority of this country
thought otherwise and re-elected him.
And further: "He bankrupted us." -- not an interpretation, just an
exaggeration.
"He proved to the world that militarily we can't win over a bunch of rag tag
insurgents." -- that's still an open question.
"He galvanized the Muslim world against us" -- they were galvanized against us
long before Bush came along -- though Bush hasn't, in my opinion, done anything
to ameliorate their historical grievances against most of the Western cultures;
"and created an elite breed of terrorists in the process." -- 'elite'?
"He did absolutely nothing to prevent (strengthen levies) Katrina." Nor did
the State of Louisiana or the City of New Orleans or the Corps of Engineers or
anyone else.
Before Andy accuses me of supporting Bush, let me remind him that I harbor
nothing but ill-will for this administration and one of my greatest joys is to
watch Fox News Sunday and hurl obscene invectives against Hume and Kristol and
Wallace and send them all emails that make Andy's rants seem reasonable. The
FACT is we're all proverbial blind men feeling an elephant.
Mike Geary
Memphis
and that's a fact.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Historians & Bush
- From: Phil Enns
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] JUST THE FACTS, MA'AM. (was Re: Re: Historians & Bush)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: JUST THE FACTS, MA'AM. (was Re: Re: Historians & Bush)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: JUST THE FACTS, MA'AM. (was Re: Re: Historians & Bush)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: JUST THE FACTS, MA'AM. (was Re: Re: Historians & Bush)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: JUST THE FACTS, MA'AM. (was Re: Re: Historians & Bush)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: JUST THE FACTS, MA'AM. (was Re: Re: Historians & Bush)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: JUST THE FACTS, MA'AM. (was Re: Re: Historians & Bush)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: JUST THE FACTS, MA'AM. (was Re: Re: Historians & Bush)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: JUST THE FACTS, MA'AM. (was Re: Re: Historians & Bush)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: JUST THE FACTS, MA'AM. (was Re: Re: Historians & Bush)
- [lit-ideas] Re: Historians & Bush
- From: Phil Enns