Le 22 oct. 04, =E0 19:36, Robert Paul a =E9crit : > I want to thank Mike Chase for pointing out to me the philosophical=20 > issues which > I hadn't seen before in the Matrix. I really hadn't thought of it, the=20= > film, in > that way, no doubt because I was caught up the leather and special=20 > effects. M.C. There are arguably quite a few more. At=20 http://whatisthematrix.warnerbros.com/rl_cmp/phi.html, one may find=20 essays on philosophy in the matrix by people well over the age of 21,=20 like David Chalmers, John Patridge, , Hubert & Stephen Dreyfus, and=20 others. I particularly liked Colin McGinn's "The Matrix of dreams". I think it's rather hard to deny that the Matrix creators had = Hilary=20 Putnam's "Brain in a vat" thought-experiment right from the start (see=20= Christopher Grau's paper on the site given above). But it also may have=20= been influence by the thought experiment described in Robert Nozick's=20 Anarchy, State, and Utopia. The Experience Machine lets us plug our=20 brain into a computer programmed to make us think we are living=20 whatever we take to be the best possible life. When plugged in, the=20 life we think we are living is a computer-induced dream. Nozick asks=20 (p. 43) : "Would you plug in? What else can matter to us, other than=20 how our lives feel from the inside=A0?" In an interesting paper entitled=20= "The meanings of life" (in D. Schmidtz, ed., Robert Nozick, Cambridge=20 2002), David Schmidtz argues that virtually all of us would refuse to=20 plug in. I'm not sure he's right, and I'm not sure the reasons he gives=20= are the most pertinent ones. I *am* sure, however, that this question is a *philosophical* = one.=20 It's also the plot of The Matrix. Michael Chase (goya@xxxxxxxxxxx) CNRS UPR 76 7, rue Guy Moquet Villejuif 94801 France ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html