Why in the world aren't all these damned lists I'm subscribed to just labeled "splittinghairs1", "splitthinghairs2", "splitthinghairs3"..... then I could keep track..... Julie Krueger with just a comb ========Original Message======== Subj: [lit-ideas] Re: Decisions, decisions Date: 10/22/04 3:38:03 AM Central Daylight Time From: _NYCEric@xxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:NYCEric@xxxxxxxxxx) To: _lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) Sent on: Donal asks "whether list-members want to name movies etc. that they think illustrate no "philosophical themes" whatever?" _____ How about Maya Deren's surrealist beauty, _Meshes of the Afternoon_? Conditions of this offer: the film willingly approaches the philosopher, bearing its philosophical themes as free gifts freely given. The philosopher does not, in his philosophical lust, roughly subdue the film and force it to yield philosophical themes. In other words, I'm assuming Donal means "the movie intentionally illustrates philosophical themes," rather than "a philosopher may use the movie to represent philosophical themes" or "a philosopher may explicate the grounding philosophical assumptions of the people who made the film" or "a philosopher may use the film as a tabula on which to project philosophical themes not inherent in the film's creation." ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html