[lit-ideas] Re: Decisions, decisions

  • From: Robert.Paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Robert Paul)
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: 25 Oct 2004 11:45:45 PDT

Mike Chase writes:

Le 24 oct. 04, =E0 14:13, Robert Paul a ecrit: Mike has the advantage of me
here, for I haven't read Chambers, et al, on [The Matrix?]...

M.C. 'nuff said. A serious discussion would presuppose precisely such a reading.
--------------------------------------
Just so there isn't any confusion let me point out that I have read plenty of
Chalmers, and a considerable amount of et al, but I haven't read what they have
to say about this film. 

I've now read 'The Matrix as Metaphysics,' by David Chalmers: 

http://jamaica.u.arizona.edu/~chalmers/papers/matrix.html

If anyone would like to have a serious discussion of this paper, I'm game. I
hope that Mike did not mean that a serious discussion of The Matrix was
equivalent to a discussion of Chalmers, et al, or that in discussing what they
have to say about the film one is discussing the film itself.

Robert Paul
Reed College
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. lit-ideas
  3. Archive
  4. 10-2004