[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: revised UEB table: first part done

  • From: Keith Creasy <kcreasy@xxxxxxx>
  • To: "liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:04:31 +0000

I have liblouisutdml building using the MSVC command-line tools under Windows 
64. What problems are you having? I'd be happy to help get you over this hump.

Keith


Keith Creasy
Software Developer
American Printing House for the Blind
KCreasy@xxxxxxx
Phone: 502.895.2405
Skype: keith537


-----Original Message-----
From: liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joseph Lee
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 9:22 AM
To: liblouis-liblouisxml
Subject: [liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: revised UEB table: first part done

Hi,
I'm still experimenting with UeB on my BrailleNote and am learning the code. 
Also, I asked a friend of mind to give me some URL's which explains differences 
between U.S. and UeB codes.
At this point, we have a half-baked solution: grade II and UeB works fine, but 
we need to work on grade 1 table where all symbols reside.
Working on grade 1 would be a challenge unless if we have many testers who 
would be willing to help us and if United Kingdom code's punctuation matches 
that of UeB. If UK code's punctuation and other symbols match that of UEB, then 
I'd be happy to tell en-ueb-g1.ctb to include en-gb-g1.ctb, provided that there 
are no major conflicts. But for now, I'd say let's concentrate on grade 2, as 
this task is easier
- we just need to find differences in text presentation (this task will take up 
to a week to complete). Thanks.
Cheers,
Joseph P.S. Who maintains UK codes for LibLouis?

On 11/16/12, Paul Wood (Torch) <paulw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> John,
> First I appreciate that the US tables are undoubtedly the best, but 
> are they the best way forward for UEB?
> Do we have access to a list of differences from BANA to UEB?
> Maybe the Australians have one?
> The reason I ask is the gb or SEB tables might not be 100% but are 
> pretty close, we have work at the moment checking this on a 'normal'
> book, but experience so far is very good, only picking up foreign 
> words and problems with apostrophes and quotes etc.
> But we do have a good list of differences between the codes, so with a 
> table expert, which I'm not! it should be quite easy to modify the SEB
> (gb) tables to UEB.
> I still haven't got a working latest liblouisudtml in windows, which 
> has been the delay for us.
> I'm going down the DAISY pipeline2 route and have latest betas to test 
> this week, which I hope to do today or Monday.
> If you can access a good list of differences for US to UEB, then of 
> course that would be the best approach!
> more info http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Braille
> HTH
> Paul
>
> On 16/11/2012 10:14, John J. Boyer wrote:
>> Hi Joseph,
>>
>> Great work. I think that trying to fix the UEB grade 1 table would be 
>> more work than modifying en-us-g1 for UEB. The en-us tables contain a 
>> lot of knowledge that the persons who made the UEB tables didn't have.
>>
>>  From what I know of UEB largesign opcodes should be replaced with 
>> always joinword should be replaced with word or maybe deleted.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 01:03:01AM -0800, Joseph Lee wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Attached is the revised UEB table based on en-us-g2.ctb. For 
>>> consistency, I named the file as "en-ueb-g2.ctb".
>>>
>>> In the first part:
>>>
>>> .         Modified the header to add my email address and wrote the fact
>>> that this table is for testing purposes only. Also declared that 
>>> this table is based on en-us-g2.ctb.
>>>
>>> .         Removed "ally" and "ation" contractions, as they are not
>>> needed
>>> anymore.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just curious: are there any problems with uebc-g1/g2.ctb? If the 
>>> problems are severe, then starting from scratch would be a good 
>>> idea, with the basis for these tables coming from en-us-g1/g2.ctb.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> //JL
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Paulw.torchtrust signature
>
> Paul Wood, Technical Services Leader
> *Torch Trust*
> Torch House, Torch Way,
> Market Harborough, Leics. LE16 9HL, UK Direct Line: *+44(0)1858 
> 438269*
> Tel: *+44(0)1858 438260*, Fax: *+44(0)1858 438275*
> Email: paulw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:paulw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Website: www.torchtrust.org <http://www.torchtrust.org/>
>
> ____________________________________________________
>
> Chief Executive: Dr Gordon Temple
> Charity No. 1095904
>
> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.
> If you are not the intended recipient please destroy this message and 
> kindly notify the sender by reply email. The computer from which this 
> mail originates is equipped with virus screening software.
> However Torch Trust cannot guarantee that the mail and its attachments 
> are free from virus infection.
>
>
For a description of the software, to download it and links to project pages go 
to http://www.abilitiessoft.com
For a description of the software, to download it and links to
project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com

Other related posts: