[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: Patch against liblouis-guide.texi
- From: "John J. Boyer" <johnjboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:21:57 -0600
Christian,
I'm just learning about svn and texinfo, but I would say go ahead and
commit. For my information, what is the advantage of using a patch. I
understand that you can just edit files and then commit the changed
versions.
I will soon have documentation on lou_debug and on a number of new
functions added to compileTranslationTable.c for use by the debugger and
other tools. I'm thinking of submitting the draft of the documentation
to the list in plain text, then putting it in texinfo format. Is this a
good approach?
Thanks,
John
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:29:14PM +0100, Christian Egli wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have a patch against liblouis-guide.texi that generates somewhat nicer
> links on the html output (the files are now named begnum-opcode.html
> instead of begnum_002dopcode.html) and has a bit more explanation around
> an example about the syllable opcode where I had a question recently
> (//www.freelists.org/post/liblouis-liblouisxml/automake-errors-with-texinfo-patch,1)
>
> The patch is attached below. Is it ok to commit?
>
> Thanks
> Christian
> --
> Christian Egli
> Swiss Library for the Blind and Visually Impaired
> Grubenstrasse 12, CH-8045 Zürich, Switzerland
--
My websites:
http://www.godtouches.org
http://www.jjb-software.com
Location: Madison, WI, USA
For a description of the software and to download it go to
http://www.jjb-software.com
Other related posts:
