[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: Patch against liblouis-guide.texi
- From: Christian Egli <christian.egli@xxxxxxxx>
- To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:01:25 +0100
Hi
On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 07:21 -0600, John J. Boyer wrote:
> I'm just learning about svn and texinfo, but I would say go ahead and
> commit.
Ok, I'll commit my changes.
> For my information, what is the advantage of using a patch. I
> understand that you can just edit files and then commit the changed
> versions.
There is no advantage to using a patch. I was just asking for permission
to change something in svn before actually doing so. To show what I was
going to change I attached a patch.
> I will soon have documentation on lou_debug and on a number of new
> functions added to compileTranslationTable.c for use by the debugger and
> other tools. I'm thinking of submitting the draft of the documentation
> to the list in plain text, then putting it in texinfo format. Is this a
> good approach?
That sounds good. I can put it into texinfo format if you like. Speaking
of texinfo: There is still my texinfo version of the liblouisxml-guide.
Should I check this in?
Thanks
Christian
--
Christian Egli
Swiss Library for the Blind and Visually Impaired
Grubenstrasse 12, CH-8045 Zürich, Switzerland
For a description of the software and to download it go to
http://www.jjb-software.com
Other related posts:
