[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: Multipass opcode suggestions.
- From: Dave Mielke <dave@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:11:08 -0500
[quoted lines by Dave Mielke on 2017/01/16 at 21:49 -0500]
Quoting (and then correcting) myself because I asked the wrong question:
To try to be backward compatible, would it make sense for all five multipass
opcodes (correct, context, pass2, pass3, pass4), if unqualified, to imply
nofor? Would this, to any of your collective knowledges, break any existing
back translation(s)?
Of course I meant should those opcodes, if unqualified, imply noback.
--
Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | The Bible is the very Word of God.
Phone: 1-613-726-0014 | Ottawa, Ontario |
http://Mielke.cc/bible/
EMail: Dave@xxxxxxxxx | Canada K2A 1H7 |
http://FamilyRadio.org/
For a description of the software, to download it and links to
project pages go to
http://liblouis.org
Other related posts:
