[LRFlex] Re: leica R lens on Digital boxes - Canoptikum

  • From: "Douglas M. Sharp" <DouglasMSharp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 19:56:19 +0100

Thanks Bob
That's what I like about these lists, there's always a lot of information and good ideas to be had.
Sounds exactly like the kind of thing I'd do, I must try it. I actually use my Nokton 50mm as a loupe when I need one.
When I'm rich and famous I'll buy some really wide wide angles for digital, which will probably be obsolete by then.
Douglas


Bob Palmieri wrote:

Doug -

If this is any help, in general lenses with lotsa depth of field have very little depth of focus, so nodal-point-to-film-plane distance becomes more critical even at small apertures.

However, last year I had a high-mag copying situation in which I loosely tested various optics in the closet (enlarging lenses, macros, etc. The surprising winner was my 21mm Voigtlander turned around backwards. Some of this was because I needed a really short focal length to get the needed magnification, but still...


Bob Palmieri


On Jan 8, 2005, at 10:28 AM, Thomas Schofield wrote:

    Even if the DOF makes it acceptable sharp, it will be a longer focal
    length, effectively!  Most people don't realize focal length is
    increasing as you focus closer.  E.g. 50mm refers to focal length at
    infinity.  In other words, the normal lens has 50mm focal length at
    infinity, or 100mm focal length at 1:1.
    Tom

    "Douglas M. Sharp" <DouglasMSharp@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    I don't think so Dave ,
    I don't think lens recycling goes that far,but I am thinking of
    getting an LTM
    to EOS adapter and messing about a bit with some old Canon screw
    mount mid-range
    telephoto lenses for close-ups.
    Does anyone know what happens if I fit a Voigtläender 12mm or 15mm
    via one of
    these to it? would stopping right down take the focus range to
    infinity? or am I
    not thinking straight and overlooking something on this idea.
    Douglas

    Dave Saalsaa wrote:
     > Oh what fun, Douglas. Can you put LTM lenses on it too and still
    focus
     > to infinity?
     > Dave
     > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Douglas M. Sharp"
     >
     > To:
     > Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 8:02 AM
     > Subject: [LRFlex] Re: leica R lens on Digital boxes - Canoptikum
     >
     >
     >> Just a bit of fun - this is where the Canon beats the excrement
    out of
     >> a certain
     >> other brand - yes, you can put Nikon lenses on it too, it's just
    that
     >> I don't have any. (And from what I've heard Canon lenses too)
     >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/TESTS
     >> Snapshots, no particular processing, no intention of creating
    artistic
     >> or aesthetic images. But isn't the beast versatile!!
     >> Damn, I forgot to show it with Contax/Yashica lenses!!
     >> Douglas
     >>
     >> Douglas
     >> Steve Barbour wrote:
     >>
     >>> that is ass-kickin' hybrid vigor...
     >>>
     >>> predictive of success in future evolutionary struggles...
     >>>
     >>> Steve
     >>>
     >> ------
     >> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
     >> www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
     >> Archives are at:
     >> www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
     >>
     >>
     >> --
     >> No virus found in this incoming message.
     >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
     >> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.8 - Release Date: 1/3/2005
     >>
     >>
     >
     >
     >
    ------
    Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
    Archives are at:
    www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    http://mail.yahoo.com


------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
   www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
   www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: