[LRflex] Re: Which is worse??
- From: <tedgrant@xxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:51:07 -0800
David Young OFFERED:
Subject: [LRflex] Which is worse??
David mon ami,
It's called the age of Aquarius and automation..."just point it in the
direction and it does everthing in some sort of fashiom of loving results.
cheers,
ted :-)
> Good Mornin'!
>
> During our trip, we took in a school Choir, singing on the interior steps
> of the Alberta Legislature
> building. A gorgeous building, and the children were delightful!
>
> http://www.furnfeather.net/Temps/Choir.html
>
> Existing light - ISO 1600 - 1/15th - hand held, but braced on the lip of a
> fountain.
>
> Standing around were a number of proud parents, taking photos of their
> kids.
>
> But, I'm confused as to which one has the poorer technique... The lady
> with her "tulip" lens shade
> one backwards, or the lady yelling "Smile for the iPad"!!!
>
> While it may work, it strikes me that an iPad is probably the world's most
> inconvenient way to do
> photography! But, the reversed shade tells me that it came that way, and
> she has never used either
> it or the focus ring!
>
> http://www.furnfeather.net/Temps/Which.html
>
> Existing light - ISO 1600 - 1/40th hand-held.
>
> C&C welcomed, as always.
>
> Cheers!
>
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
