[LRflex] The limits of digital... Is this a real limit?
- From: "Aram Langhans" <leica_r8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 06:22:21 -0700
My, my. Excellent
Question - would you expect any better with 1600 ISO film vs the 1600 ISO
digital? David may be too hard on digital.
Aram
>From: Douglas Herr <telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [LRflex] Re: The limits of digital...
>Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:58:59 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
>
>David Young <telyt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > ... my resident bird expert (Rose) tells me that that's how they
> > look, close up. The feathers blend seamlessly from one into the next. It
> > is, apparently, why they're called "waxwings"!
>
>if there are any remaining doubts, here's how the Cedar Waxwing looks on
>ISO 100 film:
>http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/bombycillidae/cewa00.html
>
>
>Doug Herr
>Birdman of Sacramento
>http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>------
>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>Archives are at:
> www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
