[LRflex] The limits of digital... Is this a real limit?

My, my.  Excellent

Question - would you expect any better with 1600 ISO film vs the 1600 ISO 
digital?  David may be too hard on digital.

Aram


>From: Douglas Herr <telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [LRflex] Re: The limits of digital...
>Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:58:59 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
>
>David Young <telyt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > ... my resident bird expert (Rose) tells me that that's how they
> > look, close up. The feathers blend seamlessly from one into the next. It
> > is, apparently, why they're called "waxwings"!
>
>if there are any remaining doubts, here's how the Cedar Waxwing looks on 
>ISO 100 film:
>http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/bombycillidae/cewa00.html
>
>
>Doug Herr
>Birdman of Sacramento
>http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>------
>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>     http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>Archives are at:
>     www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
    www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: