[LRflex] Re: R4S
- From: Chris L <speleo_karst@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 05:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
The only real reason I replaced my R4S with an R4 is that manual exposure is a
bit fiddly (you don't see the set manual speeds in the viewfinder).
While also shutter priority automatism can be useful, with my lenses and needs
I've never actually used it...
Try to get a later (R5 and later) focusing screen for it: They're brighter.
(BTW: My R4S is still on sale for much less than you paid, but in Europe).
--- On Tue, 9/8/09, Dave Tang <electricblues31@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Dave Tang <electricblues31@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [LRflex] R4S
> To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 1:39 PM
>
>
>
> #yiv1827267483 .hmmessage P
> {
> margin:0px;padding:0px;}
> #yiv1827267483 {
> font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}
>
>
>
> Just bought a R4S from the same guy I bought the 35 n 50
> Summicron. Not the mintiest copy but good enough and
> paid abt 300 USD.
>
>
> Anything I sure know about this body? Some dust on
> the viewfinder but nothing serious. Everything seems
> to work ok.
>
>
>
> Will take some pics soon. Wanted a body with Aperture
> Exposure to go with my MP. The R series is small
> enough and matches my R lens. I can carry both the R4S
> and the MP in my Billingham L2 bag.
>
>
>
> Can't wait to try out the camera. Just need to
> wait for my wife to sleep first. :)
>
>
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> Party with Buddy! Bling out your Messenger with
> free winks & emoticons. Click
> here
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
