[LRflex] Re: Question for DMR owners...
- From: David Young <telyt@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:36:25 -0700
At 27/08/2007, you wrote:
David Young <telyt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Incidentally, many folks have complained about the white balance in
> the DMR ... particularly with v1.0 and 1.1. However, with v1.2 I
> found the DMR's white balance to be every bit as good as the Canon
> 30D I'm presently using with my Leica glass.... it could stand an
upgrade, too!
IMHO, AWB is like auto-anything else: it's usually OK for the most generic
of situations but for critical work the auto-stuff falls short.
Hi Doug!
Agreed... but, even with "happy snaps", I end up correcting/improving
the colour temp (white balance) on more of my Canon shots than I ever
did with the DMR with v1.2!
For anything critical, I find, as you obviously do, that you must
always play with the WB to get things "just right".
Cheers!
---
David Young,
Logan Lake, CANADA
Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/
Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt
Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
