[LRflex] Re: Question for DMR owners...
- From: "telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:17:34 -0400
David Young <telyt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Incidentally, many folks have complained about the white balance in
> the DMR ... particularly with v1.0 and 1.1. However, with v1.2 I
> found the DMR's white balance to be every bit as good as the Canon
> 30D I'm presently using with my Leica glass.... it could stand an
upgrade, too!
IMHO, AWB is like auto-anything else: it's usually OK for the most generic
of situations but for critical work the auto-stuff falls short.
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web LIVE ? Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- Follow-Ups:
- [LRflex] Re: Question for DMR owners...
- From: David Young
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] Question for DMR owners...
- » [LRflex] Re: Question for DMR owners...
- » [LRflex] Re: Question for DMR owners...
- » [LRflex] Re: Question for DMR owners...
- » [LRflex] Re: Question for DMR owners...
- [LRflex] Re: Question for DMR owners...
- From: David Young