Agreeed. And, given recent developments at N and C, should the R10 not do HD video too? Or are we asking for too much? 2008/10/1 Frank Filippone <red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > If they can not provide auto-aperture with the current R lenses, tell them > to cancel the camera. It will be a disaster.. > This is the one feature that will make the Canon and Olympus and all the > other ( read this as significantly cheaper and possibly already available to > potential buyers) cameras with adapters go away. Completely and absolutely. > > Auto apersature is a 1960's issue.... maybe before..... even the Exakta > could do it...... It is NOT optional. No ( technical, Germanic, Austrian, > marketing BS, or otherwise) excuses.. I could care less how hard it is to > do. Get it in there. > > Without the sbility to USE ( not kludgey) the old lenses, the bodies will > not sell... I don't care how many GP, low light, optimum quality, or > otherwise. Ergonomics is terribly important. > > So how so I really feel? Like this is critical. > > Frank Filippone > red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > The one "price" for this compatibility will be the mechanism required > to actuate the aperture in the older lenses. Electronic aperture > control (as is done in Canon and the S2, among others) is cheaper to > implement than a mechanical method, while also being more > reliable. Doing both would cost Leica more. But, again, Pentax has > kept their mechanical aperture control and maintained a very > competitive price. So, if they can do it, I guess Leica can, too. > > > > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/