[LRflex] Re: How to sell more M8s, well, sort of...

  • From: Douglas Herr <telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:12:05 -0400 (EDT)

William Abbott <wbabbott3@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> ... I believe the DMR should be upgraded to applicable R10  
>technology, especially the R10 electronic technology that can be  
>implemented in the DMR.

Bill,

Your answer to my rather hurried response is quite reasonable.  I think the 
upgrades as extensive as you've suggested would require a DMR.2

I agree that the M8 technology is probably not the most appropriate for the 
(hypothetical) DMR.2 and that I'd like to see R10 technology in such a back.  
My preference would be to keep the DMR's .DNG file fully 16 bits rather than 
using the smaller file format the M8 uses.


Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. leicareflex
  3. Archive
  4. 10-2007