Phil Somers pwsomers@xxxxxxxx writes: > If there is a contradiction between the RAC Operating Manual and the RAC web > pages, then that would be yet another RAC problem. I'd be surprised if one > ham > in a hundred has that Manual. > > If the online RAC 220 MHz Band Plan (Approved 1997) is wrong on what seems > like > a critical issue, then perhaps the on-line band plan should be corrected. > From > your information on dates, it has now been three years and two months since > that change was made. It would seem like such a change could be made on the > web > pages in a few minutes. As an aside, I have volunteered to help with the RAC > web site, but again have had no response. > > My original statement was: "The 220 MHz band was not removed and it was not > lost". This cross-border sharing is for 220 -222 MHz and affects hams living > within 120 km of the border. The entire 222 - 225 MHz is unaffected and is > fully available. I suggested we make an effort to try to use it. But everyone > is silent on actually doing anything. http://www.rac.ca/service/bandplans/220plan_e.php has the band starting at 220MHz. RAC's 7th edition study guide ISBN 1895400171, page 5-12 published 2007, has "Status: Shared 219-220 MHz, Amateur exclusive 222-225MHz (220-222 MHz removed from amateur service 25 January 2006, notice states that this sub-band will be available under 'exceptional circumstances' for emergency communications..." with the bandplan "being revised". What is the history of this? Was 219MHz ever in-band for Canadian VE3's, or is this an Americanism?