[kag] Re: attachments

  • From: "Helen Baker" <hbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <kag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:38:47 -0500

I agree with Celine, I do not want joke attachments, enough come through on my regular e-mails.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Celine Tauchid" <crst@xxxxxxx>
To: <kag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 1:49 PM
Subject: [kag] Re: attachments



Indeed I agree about the joke attachments... they can get annoying.

But other times I appreciate attachments that are relevant.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Hoover" <mlehotay@xxxxxxx>
To: <kag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 12:46 PM
Subject: [kag] attachments



About a year ago I started allowing attachments to be posted to the
mailing list, and gave myself veto power over any messages larger than
128KB. In all this time, only two messages were larger than that, and I
decided to approve both of them.

What does everybody think about allowing attachments? Should we allow
them? Yes? No? If I set a maximum size, what should it be?

Thanks for your input,
Hoover

------------------------------------------------------------
Kingston Area Geocachers mailing list
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/kag


------------------------------------------------------------ Kingston Area Geocachers mailing list http://www.freelists.org/webpage/kag


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 17/02/2006





------------------------------------------------------------
Kingston Area Geocachers mailing list
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/kag

Other related posts: