[kag] Re: attachments

  • From: "Lloyd Baker" <binrat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <kag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:11:52 -0500

I would allow them, but to a specified size. If the item is over the limit and is very relevant to Geocaching the send should email you to request a permission slip and to get it sent.

Binrat


----- Original Message ----- From: "Hoover" <mlehotay@xxxxxxx>
To: <kag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 12:46 PM
Subject: [kag] attachments



About a year ago I started allowing attachments to be posted to the mailing list, and gave myself veto power over any messages larger than 128KB. In all this time, only two messages were larger than that, and I decided to approve both of them.

What does everybody think about allowing attachments? Should we allow them? Yes? No? If I set a maximum size, what should it be?

Thanks for your input,
Hoover

------------------------------------------------------------
Kingston Area Geocachers mailing list
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/kag


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 17/02/2006





------------------------------------------------------------
Kingston Area Geocachers mailing list
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/kag

Other related posts: