More grey cell deterioration!When I got my finger out and went back to what I'll laughingly call my documentation, it was to find that since it looked ploughed up when first I looked at it, for FS9, I abandoned it.
Gerry Winskill Gerry Winskill wrote:
Alder Hall is an excellent example of misleading data; perhaps because my copy of Lockyears bears the legend, in bold type, "LAND ONLY IN AN EMERGENCY!"The Lockyears data is N52 12 W01 17; pretty vague anyway. The correct location is N52 36.49 W01 16,27The longtitude vagueness is possibly within acceptable limits, if you aren't in an emergency situation. To publish a Latitude so much in error should be an offence!Alder Hall was one of the first farmstrips I issued, in FS9. At least, in the virtual world, we are unlikeky to be greeted by armed keepers, employed by the owner of the clearly discernible Hall.Gerry Winskill Fossil wrote:In fact Allensmore is a good example at how hard it can be to locate someairfields and why the Catalogue is so difficult to produce. I can only start off with published data and if that is wrong it takes a lot of research todig out the actual location. Strange as it seems many airfields stay very quiet about their operations and their position remains word of mouth or are vague entries in Pooleys. There's a good study on this at http://www.gaac.org.uk/gasar/GASAR_AerodromeCategorisation.pdf where theyhave graded airfields from A to F. Airfields in the A category are the majorplayers like Heathrow with good publicity and data freely available (AIP, web pages) whilst airfields in the F category are described as such: "The final category contains ninety-eight flying sites that may be best described asBasic Airstrips. 95% of aerodromes in this category are listed in Lockyearsand only a third are to be found in either Pooleys or AFE flight. Aerial photography rarely reveals any aircraft parkedin the open and less than half show any sign of hangarage. All sites in thiscategory are grass,87% have only one direction and 97% have TORA lengths less than 900 metres.As might beexpected 90% are consequently not identifiable on general purpose OS maps.None haverunway lighting or navigational aids and only Caunton has occasional groundto air radio.Facilities are very limited. Only one offers maintenance, only four fuel andonly three can provide a cup of coffee. Customs and training schools are non existent. These sites are 90%owned by individuals although eight are listed as run by companies and onlyone by a club. Since data for this category was mainly dependent upon Lockyears and Lockyears does notindicate landing fees the assumption is that most sites are either free oropen to donations." Note the bit about limited notification (Lockyears only) and that even aerial photography fails to locate them.I have a similar problem with Alder Hall. The published position is N52:12 W01:17 but it's total rubbish. I suspect the airfield is some 20nm north ofthat location near Desford but proving this is going to take some time. Aweb search isn't much good because all the other UK Airfield listing pages just print the location direct from Lockyears or they nick the data from my site (it's amazing how a couple of intentional typos can track these down).Early on in my work on compiling the Catalogue I found that you cannot trustany written source. I found majors errors in Pooleys, AFE, Jeppesen andAerad but the official volumes of the AIP and the RAF En Route Supplementsweren't immune from them either.Google Earth has been a great boost in doing this work because it is finally possible to cross check published positions against visual data. In fact I have decided to start again with the Catalogue and go through every singleairfield just to ensure every position is valid - using GE as the primearbiter for location. The only airfields that I can't verify in this manner are the early WW1 fields and those that closed prior to WW2 - those in brown on my lists. It's a big change because the KML file is now going to becomethe master copy and the web page and spreadsheet will be slaved to this. bones bones@xxxxxxx -----Original Message-----From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On BehalfOf Gerry Winskill Sent: 19 May 2009 20:10 To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [jhb] Re: Odd IVAO + FSX crash - grrrrIn fact, looking closely at it in conjunction with Lockyears, I'd risk a bet it's defunct.The glass houses are remarkably clear but there's no sign of the T hangar, to the East of the runway location. Also, to the West of the glasshouses was said to be the Tram Inn. The drinkers must be long gone, as there's a large factory there now. Shades of Max Boyce!Gerry Winskill Gerry Winskill wrote:I claim my prize. It's at 51 59.51 2 46.51. The day the GE shot was taken the mower must have been in for a service.It's in Lockyears but the given co-ordinates of N52 00 W02 50 are mind blowingly inaccurate!Gerry Winskill Fossil wrote:Equally annoying is looking for a known airfield in high definition GE andstill not being able to find it. Allensmore is a private strip 4nm SW of Hereford. It has an entry in Pooleys, features in quite a few web pages and even in an AAIB Accident Report. The Lat and Long published in Pooleys N52:00.01 W02:50.08 isobviously wrong because my yellow dot in GE is in the middle of a wood - sowhere is it?I can't test your airfield spotting abilities now because I have already updated the Airfield Page with the new position but it would have been an interesting exercise to see if you could have found it when starting fromthe wrong position above. It took me three hours. bones bones@xxxxxxx -----Original Message-----From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On BehalfOf Peter Dodds Sent: 19 May 2009 14:35 To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: pdodds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [jhb] Re: Odd IVAO + FSX crash - grrrrI've just been looking for Erinagh airfield (near Nenagh, Co, Tipperary) as I'm planning to fly there next month to visit friends. I was amazed at the very poor definition of Google Earth in rural Ireland. It is so badthere is no sign of the airfield. (700m grass). Peter*From:* Gerry Winskill <gwinsk@xxxxxxx> *To:* jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx *Date:* Mon, 18 May 2009 18:51:36 +0100Aldergrove looks OK but it's sitting in the cr..py Default Northern Ireland coverage. I won't be buying until the distant day when there's a photo scenery Ireland.Gerry Winskill