>From memory, the major changes were
improved interface with ability to
handle XML files,
the inclusion
the ability to set altitude restrictions within the flight
plan,
connectivity
to Google Earth making it an alternative to Plan-G should you
wish,
though why would you when Plan-G is free.<g>
Export the plan to
the FMC of a few more aircraft types
I downloaded the original
FS9 trial and although the interface is nicer in
some ways I am like
you and never updated. Having said that, I still use
FSC 8.6 on a
regular basis though not exclusively, I'll also use
routefinder
online (
http:/rfinder.asalink.net/free) for heavy metal routes
or
plan-G for VFR.
Is it worth an additional £20? A personal
choice, not for me though I paid
for FSC7 then again to upgrade to
FSC8 so I think they've had enough of my
money when I can do
evrything I require without the additional features.
Paul
From:
jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf
Of John Hill
Sent: 09 June 2012 09:41
To:
jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: [jhb] FS Commander 9
Hi
Folks,
I was just wondering if anyone uses Fs Commander
and if so have you upgraded
from FSC 8 to FSC 9. I currently have
v8.6 and downloaded the v9.2 trial.
Apart from a couple of small
things and a nicer looking interface I don’t
see a lot of difference.
So was just wondering if it’s worth the £20
upgrade. I haven’t been
able to find any up to date reviews online so any
opinions would be
welcome
Cheers
John H (2)
No
virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG -
www.avg.comVersion:
2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2433/5056 - Release Date: 06/08/12