[jhb] Re: FS Commander 9
- From: "Paul Reynolds" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 12:31:53 +0100
From memory, the major changes were improved interface with ability to
handle XML files,
the inclusion the ability to set altitude restrictions within the flight
plan,
connectivity to Google Earth making it an alternative to Plan-G should you
wish, though why would you when Plan-G is free.<g>
Export the plan to the FMC of a few more aircraft types
I downloaded the original FS9 trial and although the interface is nicer in
some ways I am like you and never updated. Having said that, I still use
FSC 8.6 on a regular basis though not exclusively, I'll also use
routefinder online (http:/rfinder.asalink.net/free) for heavy metal routes
or plan-G for VFR.
Is it worth an additional £20? A personal choice, not for me though I paid
for FSC7 then again to upgrade to FSC8 so I think they've had enough of my
money when I can do evrything I require without the additional features.
Paul
From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of John Hill
Sent: 09 June 2012 09:41
To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jhb] FS Commander 9
Hi Folks,
I was just wondering if anyone uses Fs Commander and if so have you upgraded
from FSC 8 to FSC 9. I currently have v8.6 and downloaded the v9.2 trial.
Apart from a couple of small things and a nicer looking interface I don?t
see a lot of difference. So was just wondering if it?s worth the £20
upgrade. I haven?t been able to find any up to date reviews online so any
opinions would be welcome
Cheers
John H (2)
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2433/5056 - Release Date: 06/08/12
Other related posts:
