Ashley used to have G-AWIT and G-AYPV, both circa 1970 vintage aircraft. Horrifyingly I remember them when they were brand new. bones bones@xxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gerry Winskill Sent: 18 October 2009 10:50 To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [jhb] Re: Andreas Whilst there a Cherokee appeared and landed. A check shows it belongs to a chap in Bride. I looked up past owners and is started its IOM existance with Ashley Garner. Gerry Winskill Fossil wrote: > Andreas was essentially derelict from the 1960's onwards. It was not used as > an airfield for a long time despite Lionel trying to attract customers. Some > of us had permission to fly in during the 1970's but I only tried it once - > the surface was terrible. It wasn't just grass growing through the concrete, > it had wheel size holes in the surface and FOD lying all over the place. > > It was only the gliding/microlight activity that kicked it into action and > they had to tidy up the surface runway themselves. The hangars are indeed > cheapo affairs and the clubhouse an old Portakabin. My photos of that period > show Andreas in a very bad state and more farmland than airfield. It seems > not to have changed much but I doubt anyone is going to fork out for > bringing it up to even reasonable condition. > > Manx Flyers had a ban on the place after they had to replace two props badly > dented by the loose surface. > > bones > bones@xxxxxxx > > > -----Original Message----- > From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > Of Gerry Winskill > Sent: 18 October 2009 09:25 > To: JHB Restricted > Subject: [jhb] Andreas > > I mentioned earlier, I think, that I couldn't get access to Andreas, so > that Tony Meredith might do a more accurate version. Well, yesterday I > got in. The announcement, last week, that there was to be a landing at > Jurby was wrong. It was in fact the arrival at Andreas of a locally > funded Kodiak; a present to a Missionary Organisation. > > Having got in, ostensibly as being interested in the mission, I was > quite shocked at how different it is from the GE based version that I > did, a couple of years ago, and the more recent Tony Meredith version. > > The shock started with the hangars, which are just a couple of small > plastic sheet over hoops type. Rather like an overgrown Nissen hut. > > Next was how little of the rest of the field can be seen, from the > hangar area. Most of the total area is covered in cereal crops, with > scrub thrown in, to limit sightlines. > > The old disused runway section used as the visitors' apron is tiny and > has scrub on one side and what look like a collection of scrap vehicles > on the other. One of these is the fuel bowser! > > The derelict WWII Control Tower isn't, now, even in the same fields. > > It was only thinking about it after arriving home that I realised it was > my expectation that was wrong. If thought of as a farm strip whose > runways just happen to be clapped out tarmac, then that gives a better > appreciation of the place. > > Unfortunately, most design problems don't do dereliction! > > Gerry Winskill > > >