Re: Quicken

Probably about the same as 2001. I just mean that Quicken can haveits 
frustrating moments.

Stan

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Alyssa 
  To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 3:50 PM
  Subject: RE: Quicken 


  Stan, what do you mean? Is it less than accessible than Quicken 2001?
    -----Original Message-----
    From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf 
Of sholdeman
    Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 2:45 PM
    To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Subject: Re: Quicken 


    Hi Alyssa: I am using Quicken 2003 with jaws 6.2. It is not the best, but 
it does work.

    Stan

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Alyssa 
      To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 3:09 PM
      Subject: Quicken 


      Hi everyone.

      My name is Alyssa, and I am new to the list. I have been a JAWS user for 
several years and haven't had too many problems with it, but I have suddenly 
come upon something that concerns me.

      I purchased Quicken Basic 2006 yesterday, only to bring it home and find 
out that it is a little too graphical for JFW. So I called the company, and 
they are going to send me a free version of Quicken 2003 deluxe. In comparison 
with the 2006 version, does this work well with JFW? I used to have Quicken 
2001 Basic on an old computer, which worked fine... And I noticed that the JFW 
help says that 2003 will work. I just wanted to get some input from fellow 
users of the program!

      -Alyssa

Other related posts: