Re: New Features for JFW 7.0 Posted
- From: Dave Durber <dadurber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 23:33:31 -0400
Maybe, if more individuals took the time and made the effort to learn
their screen-reader, there would definitely be less complaining.
As a result, One of the main benefits might be that Freedom Scientific
may once again take this list more seriously and make a point of
posting developments and news, directly to this list, instead of us
getting the information second, third or even fourth hand.
A further benefit might be that some of the employees from Freedom
scientific would consider re-joining the list, with the result that
we, as users of JAWS for windows, would all benefit from their
experience, knowledge and expertise. I am certain, there is no one on
this list who would turn up their noses at that, now would they!
Sincerely:
Dave Durber
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:00:49 -0400, you wrote:
>Here, here!
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Chris Skarstad" <toonhead5@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 9:59 PM
>Subject: Re: New Features for JFW 7.0 Posted
>
>
>> Well these new features can all be turned off. I didn't like the
>> announcement of progress bars in internet explorer. So, did I complain
>> about it? Nope! I figured out how to turn it off, and I did. No more
>> problems. If people wold only learn how to better manage their
>> screenreader and take control of it we wouldn't have all this complaining.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> At 08:38 PM 9/24/2005, you wrote:
>>>Hi Rose and list:
>>>
>>>No I don't object because I don't think I have to use it if I don't want
>>>to.
>>>
>>>What I am disappointed in, however, is the changing of commands in order
>>>to avoid conflict with Firefox. I don't like new features defaulting to on
>>>because the assumption is clear that everyone would want them. Now I
>>>realise that they are just following a common practice in this regard. But
>>>that doesn't make it right.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Dave
>>>--
>>>To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
>>>jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
>>>Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>>>
>>>If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
>>>the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
>>>contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> --
>> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
>> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
>> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>>
>> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
>> the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
>> contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>
>
>--
>To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
>jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
>Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>
>If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
>way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
>list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
