[isapros] Re: Configuring Direct Access in ISA 2004 SP2

  • From: "Thomas W Shinder" <tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 11:21:18 -0500

Hi Stefaan,

That's got to be the whackieist KB article I've ever seen for a hotfix
package. The only issue it fixes is with SSL tunneling on different
ports, and I didn't even know there was an issue with that! :)

I entered a tasteful comment on the page so maybe someone will read it
someday.

Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Site: www.isaserver.org
Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
MVP -- ISA Firewalls

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stefaan Pouseele
> Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 7:27 AM
> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [isapros] Configuring Direct Access in ISA 2004 SP2
> 
> Hey guys, 
> 
> we all know that ISA Server 2004 SP2 makes some changes to 
> the way that
> destinations specified for direct access are handled. What 
> *exactly* has
> changed is described in
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;903746. 
> 
> In February 2006, I made a PSS call to fix that issue and 
> received a private
> fix. The 'trick' was a modified wpad.dat script that allows 
> the use of URL's
> to specify direct access (e.g. '*.microsoft.com/*') without 
> breaking the
> changes introduced in SP2 for the branch office scenario's. 
> Unfortunately,
> the private fix was broken by 
> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=916106. 
> 
> According to last post (Sunday, June 18, 2006 3:56 AM) at
> https://blogs.technet.com/isablog/archive/2006/02/27/420653.as
> px there is a
> fix for the Direct Access issue, which you can get by calling Product
> Support and requesting the fix for KB 920716. On July 5, 2006 
> the KB was
> released with the title "Description of the ISA Server 2004 
> hotfix package:
> June 6, 2006"
> (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;92071
> 6). However, I
> can't find any reference to the Direct Access issue! 
> 
> Has any body some more info about it? 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Stefaan
> 
> 
> 
> 

Other related posts: