Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
what everryone seems to ignore is the OP had asked the question: 'how is
it secure in spite of the fact that the code is available' . This means
that the assumption is: "if the code is available, then malicious
parties will be able to crack the software easily'. The trouble with our
people is that they are so enamoured of the word 'freedom' that they
ignore the question asked and immediatly begin to spout their mantras.
