[PCB_FORUM] Re: XNet dilemma

  • From: "Macindoe, Gary" <Gary.Macindoe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 18:41:18 -0400

Thanks Dave, that did the trick!

 

Regards,

 

Gary MacIndoe

Senior PCB Layout Designer

Contract - Kelly Services

Covidien 

EbD R&D

5920 Longbow Drive

Boulder, CO 80301

 

303.476.7458

www.covidien.com

 

From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Seymour
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:08 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: XNet dilemma

 

Gary,

 

That's different.

 

If one assigns the Voltage Property to the PWR/GND nets (P3V3VDC in this
case) then the Xnet understands the discrete is really and termination
and won't form the Xnet.

 

 Edit > Properties > (find filter set to "Nets") > Voltage = 3.3v, GND =
0V

 

Dave

 

 

Dave Seymour

Ixia

www.ixiacom.com

919.267.4840

________________________________

From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Macindoe, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 5:45 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: XNet dilemma

 

Well, the net "P3V3VDC" is a member of the XNet "EEPROM_WP" for one
example (3.3V & EEPROM write protect?).

I don't think there is a reason to have xnets setup at all.

 

I like to put the property Ratsnest_Schedule = Power_And_Ground on my
power and gnd nets so that the rats look like this:

 

 

 

Instead of the rats going all over the place (yeah, I don't like filled
pads either!).

 

 

Regards,

 

Gary MacIndoe

Senior PCB Layout Designer

Contract - Kelly Services

Covidien 

EbD R&D

5920 Longbow Drive

Boulder, CO 80301

 

303.476.7458

www.covidien.com

 

From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shaw,
Christopher
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 3:28 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: XNet dilemma

 

But what do you mean exactly by 'should not be there'?

Chris

 

From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Seymour
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:25 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: XNet dilemma

 

Edit> Properties (find filter set to Comps) > No_Xnet_Connection

 

Or

 

Specifically, remove the model from the component.

 

Analyze > Model Assignment > Select the part and clear the model. ( this
will come back if you reassign all models or auto assign)

 

Hope this helps.

 

Dave

 

 

Dave Seymour

Ixia

www.ixiacom.com

919.267.4840

________________________________

From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Macindoe, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 5:17 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] XNet dilemma

 

Hey guys,

 

I have some XNets in my design that should not be there.

 

I asked the DE and he said that he didn't add them in the schematic (he
doesn't even know about them).

 

Does anyone know if there is a way to remove them in Allegro?

 

Thanks for any help.

 

Regards,

 

Gary MacIndoe

Senior PCB Layout Designer

Contract - Kelly Services

Covidien 

EbD R&D

5920 Longbow Drive

Boulder, CO 80301

 

303.476.7458

www.covidien.com

 

JPEG image

Other related posts: