[ibis-macro] [Fwd: RE: [1076.1] Information on proposed IP support in VHDL-200X]

From: Bob Ross <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: ibis-macro <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:54:09 -0700

FYI
Bob

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [1076.1] Information on proposed IP support in VHDL-200X
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:44:03 +0200
From: Alain Vachoux <alain.vachoux@xxxxxxx>
To: "1076.1 mailing list" <vhdl-ams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,

The reply from Lance Thomson to Arpad's email bounced so I'm reposting it.

Best regards,
Alain Vachoux

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To: "Muranyi, Arpad" <arpad.muranyi@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "1076.1 mailing list" <vhdl-ams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [1076.1] Information on proposed IP support in VHDL-200X
From: Lance Thompson <lancet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:06:11 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on d27ml101/27/M/IBM(Release
7.0.1|January 17, 2006) at
  06/20/2006 11:06:13 AM,
        Serialize complete at 06/20/2006 11:06:13 AM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative
0058751F86257193_="
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1551/Tue Jun 20 06:37:21 2006 on
server.eda-stds.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 0058751F86257193_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Yes, I did see it and my first thought was not a polite one  :-)   But
upon reading the article, they refer to the upcoming revision of
1364-2005. The IP protection scheme proposed for 1364 and 1076 and,
apparently, Synplicity have a common heritage.  In fact, the 1076
proposal is a proper subset of the 1364 proposal.  (1076 chose to subset
it to create strong security protocols.)

So, I think Synplicity is actually in the same ballpark and one might
consider them to be an early adopter of the proposed standards.  It
would be a good question for them to address.

Lance Thompson
Senior Engineer
Engineering & Technology Services


"Muranyi, Arpad" <arpad.muranyi@xxxxxxxxx>
06/20/2006 11:00 AM

To
"1076.1 mailing list" <vhdl-ams@xxxxxxxx>
cc
Lance Thompson/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS
Subject
RE: [1076.1] Information on proposed IP support in VHDL-200X


Has anyone seen this article?

http://eetimes.com/news/design/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=189500419

I wonder how this fits into the picture.  I would
hate to see competing standards because it will turn
everything into tool dependent, and non-interchangeable
again...

Arpad
========================================================

--
Bob Ross
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC     Teraspeed Labs
121 North River Drive              13610 SW Harness Lane
Narragansett, RI 02882             Beaverton, OR 97008
401-284-1827                       503-430-1065
http://www.teraspeed.com           503-246-8048 Direct
bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Teraspeed is a registered service mark of Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Macro website  :  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/
IBIS Macro reflector:  //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro
To unsubscribe send an email:
 To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: unsubscribe

[ibis-macro] [Fwd: RE: [1076.1] Information on proposed IP support in VHDL-200X]

Other related posts: