[ibis-macro] Re: Agendor for IBIS ATM 3/2/10
- From: "Muranyi, Arpad" <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "IBIS-ATM" <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:22:01 -0800
Thanks for all the comments and suggestions on the next steps.
Turning Bob's recent comments into a more immediate and
practical question, I would like to make a few decisions
on how this second pass of the AMI BIRD would be carried
out. In specific, we need to decide who will do the editorial
work and be the owner of the of the document. This could
be a single person or a small team consisting of a few
people. The responsibility of this team or person would
be to go through the entire document, make the editorial
changes and present those changes to the ATM subcommittee.
I would favor to make this decision in our next meeting
tomorrow, because I am concerned that if we start addressing
the BIRD amendments as Walter suggested it, we would lose
track of what we have done so far in the first pass of the
BIRD. Also, some of the amendments may have dependencies
in the main BIRD document, so it may be a good idea to
finalize that in order to avoid the following a moving
target syndrome.
Thanks,
Arpad
==============================================================
-----Original Message-----
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob Ross
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 1:42 PM
To: wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: Agendor for IBIS ATM 3/2/10
Walter and All:
I agree with the Tuesday agenda plan. We are making progress in
addressing some top-level concerns.
I want to address Walter's last statement: "... and determine what
are next steps are to be able to have this committee submit a draft
of the AMI BIRD to the Open Forum for discussion."
We need to do the editorial restructuring of Section 6C to move
forward, both for now and for any future inclusions. Without getting
into full details, we need these actions:
Outline the Chapter Sections and move related content into sections
Do a Terminology review and update the terminology
Then do final technical review.
For example, the .ami syntax is now split apart into two areas.
It should all be under an .AMI syntax subsection and
its subsections to clearly present the syntax rules.
The terminology needs to be considered and stabilized. AMI-Keyword
for .ami might be defined to have it different than Keyword for IBIS
models (including in Section 6C(. Then "Allowed-Values" becomes
"Allowed-Keywords."
This restructing might could be done off-line by a separate editing
team or by some other process to get to a new baseline.
Then we can do a final technical review where all the factors for
a rule and their impact are fully considered.
Then we reach the final goal for the IBIS Open Forum consideration:
A complete, clear and technically robust BIRD that describes what was
intended.
Bob
--
Bob Ross
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC Teraspeed Labs
121 North River Drive 13610 SW Harness Lane
Narragansett, RI 02882 Beaverton, OR 97008
401-284-1827 503-430-1065
http://www.teraspeed.com 503-246-8048 Direct
bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Teraspeed is a registered service mark of Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Macro website : http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/
IBIS Macro reflector: //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro
To unsubscribe send an email:
To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: unsubscribe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Macro website : http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/
IBIS Macro reflector: //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro
To unsubscribe send an email:
To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: unsubscribe
Other related posts:
