[HUG ] Re: Odious Comparison
- From: Bernard <bernard_cousineau@xxxxxxxx>
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:44:26 -0400
The problem is I have been looking at the new prints
and am starting to wonder if they are significantly sharper than the
ones taken with the 120 – and whether this means that I have a beauty of
a new lens – HOORAY – or if the dear old Makro Planar is having problems
– SNIF....
Are the prints actually sharper, or do they have higher contrast?
I know that when the CFi (CFe?) version of the 120 came out, one of the claimed
improvements was higher contrast, especially in a studio situation where you may
have lights just outside the frame.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [HUG ] Re: Odious Comparison
- From: BOB KISS
- [HUG ] Re: Odious Comparison
- From: flexbody
- References:
- [HUG ] Odious Comparison
- From: Stein
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] Odious Comparison
- » [HUG ] Re: Odious Comparison
- » [HUG ] Re: Odious Comparison
- » [HUG ] Re: Odious Comparison
- » [HUG ] Re: Odious Comparison
- » [HUG ] Re: Odious Comparison
- [HUG ] Re: Odious Comparison
- From: BOB KISS
- [HUG ] Re: Odious Comparison
- From: flexbody
- [HUG ] Odious Comparison
- From: Stein