[HUG ] Re: New Issue Victor is out there......

Quoting peter jensen, who wrote on Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 08:07:39AM -0400 ..
> ----  <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Worth reading is a comparison of CF lenses with the new Digital lenses..... 
> > LOTS of marketing hype..... 
> > 
> 
> To anyone who reads Victor, what's the upshot? How DO they compare (CF vs. 
> digiplastik)? 
> 
> I noted this at the Hasselblad USA website: "All HC lenses are engineered to 
> ensure optimal performance and image quality, whether using film or digital." 
> But then you oughta use Phocus (does this cost extra?)for "Digital lens 
> corrections for color aberration, distortion and vignetting."
> 
> Elsewhere, "Carl Zeiss [CF] lenses produce unbeatable image contrast and 
> color saturation - superior quality, ultimate flexibility, and no 
> compromises." Unlike, say, digital? Just wondering.

C/CF era: lenses better be OK on their own.  If it does not get onto film 
in a decent fashion you were basically foo-bared.

H era: lenses can be a bit less stellar "because we can tweak it with the
computer in post-process".

Something like that?

Wilko

=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: