> > Alright, I had another idea and decided to try it out. I noticed that > MAXJOBS is defined in jam.h as 64. I changed it to 128, hoping that the > "waif child found!" error in execunix.c wouldn't occur (it happens when > 'i' in a for loop matched the value of MAXJOBS). > Okay, I meant to reply to this, but I keep accidentally (stupidly?) using another email address, hence my message not making it through. Anyways, here is my reply to myself... Basically after numerous tries and different values for MAXJOBS, I seem to get the waif problem every time now. Apparently the first success was just some kind of fluke, unfortunately. I may fool around with it a bit more, but maybe it's a waste of time, considering it takes 3 seconds to comment out some code like you suggested, Axel. That said, I still plan the R5 install this week, since using that as a build platform should potentially resolve these Dano/Zeta issues. - joe