Eh, a point for you :) > Because a lot of people don´t know what they're talking about. > > Travis I'm sorry to say that even if BONE crashes sometimes for me, it does it far less than net_server, which used to eat up all the memory before freezing all the system every 5 minutes when using BeShare (so I don't see the use of out-of -kernel networking if it crashes it anyway :P) Moreover in-kernel networking has it ups: - available at boot, which means : bootp, nfs root (for *nix OSes that is) ... - lower latency - higher throughput - sockets as files (yeah I know we can do it for net_server as well using a user filesystem or a device driver, but hey that's not plain userland then :P) En réponse à Manuel Jesus Petit de Gabriel <freston@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > But a question remain. Why so many people flamed Be Inc to include > the > > network stuff (BONE) inside the kernel itself, if that kernel was > monolithic > > anyway ? I'm a bit confuse here. Someone can put a light on this for > me ? > > I think it has to do with the massive instabilities in the early > versions of > Bone, > net_server crashed as much than those early versions... but at least > the > system > remained alive with net_server. > > > manuel, > > > > > thanks > > Steve > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Manuel Jesus Petit de Gabriel" <freston@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 7:36 PM > > Subject: [openbeos] Re: on SoftwareValet for OBOS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm fully on your side. The most important part in the name > "OpenBeOS" > > > must > > > > be ... "BeOS". And I'm not a big fan of Linux too (I hate > monolithics > > > > kernels). > > > > > > This paragraph is not coherent: first praise BeOS for later stating > that > > you > > > hate monolithic kernels. BeOS kernel is a monolithic (thought > modular) > > one. > > > > > > > > > manuel, > > > > > > > > > > > > > >