[openbeos] Re: RFC archieve and public access
- From: "Nathan Whitehorn" <nathan.whitehorn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 10:59:56 EST (-0500)
> I agree with you, but I think that you have misunderstood what I
> think Nathan was saying.
> I think that he was trying to say that GE should not contribute every
> idea ever brought up
> on their mailing list wholesale, but that GE, internally, should
> seriously consider every idea and
> try to have some filtration methodology within itself, so that what
> comes out of the GE project
> is the "best of breed" ideas. Then the coders can decide to do/not to
> do. I think that is a lot of
> value added, from GE, and it is exactly what Nathan and I discussed
> when we "merged" GE into
> OBOS.
Exactly. Thanks for the clarification.
-Nathan
--
Fortune Cookie Says:
As long as the answer is right, who cares if the question is wrong?
Other related posts:
