>And we have been in communication with many of the people who will be >coding it (like me). In fact, most of the OBOS people who would be in >charge of aspect x of the OS are the very people who have set forth >proposals on aspect x. GE = OBOS. It's the same people, doing the same >things, in a different light. GE does not impose things on OBOS. The >concept is ridiculous, since they are one and the same project. >-Nathan The original email wasn't very clear at all in that case. It read as if GE decided OBOS's future, and when they had voted on a feature it was sent to the programmers to implement. Thanks Andrew Edward McCall mccall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- OpenBeOS! - Join the revolution now! http://www.openbeos.org/