[openbeos] Re: Pe in SVN ?
- From: "Juan Sebastian Muñoz Arango" <naruse@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:41:23 -0500
WTF? Emacs >>>>>>> vi*
On Feb 13, 2008 11:35 AM, Bruno Antunes <sardaukar.siet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Precisely! (just adding to the vi/emacs flamewar here) :D
>
>
> On Feb 13, 2008 5:31 PM, Andrew McCall <andrew.mccall@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 13/02/2008, François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I still use BeIDE mostly over Pe because I didn't yet fix its azerty-
> > > unfriendly shortcut handling. I checked it from cvs to have a look at
> > > it recently.
> > >
> > > Fact is the cvs is hosted at BeUnited, which we don't know how long it
> > > will last. Shouldn't we put this one in svn ?
> > > src/apps or 3rdparty ? IIRC we agreed to have it as default IDE so
> > it'd
> > > be src/apps.
> > >
> > > Wait a minute, wasn't it XEmacs we chose ? :p
> >
> > Pah, XEmacs! vi is lightweight and fits with Haiku's goals.
> >
> > > François.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andrew McCall
> > andrew.mccall@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Bruno
> ---------------------------
> Fidonet 2:5004/75.260
Other related posts:
